abstract art

April 26, 2011 | Posted by | 1 Comment

Abstract Lines of Association

"Gypsum" by Tracy Burke on Zatista.com

Have you seen this video of the Aurora Borealis created by Norwegian landscape photographer Terje Sorgjerd? It’s absolutely magnificent.

"Paranoia2" by Rosa Migliardi on Zatista.com

I’m known around the Zatista neighborhood as a bit of a sucker for sunrises and sunsets. What can I say? I like pretty colors, so I might as well admit that the Aurora Borealis is another “unsophisticated” thing that inspires me to buy art.

"Aware" by Tracy Mewmaw on Zatista.com

The really cool thing about being able to look at a lot of art all at once (as you can here on Zatista, conveniently enough) is that you may find yourself drawn to pieces by association. You don’t have to limit yourself to just buying direct representational images of things you love, you can branch out into the abstract.

"The Summer of 1990" by Jon Bidwell on Zatista.com

All of these pieces reminded me of the Northern Lights. And when an image reminds you of one of your favorite things, it doesn’t start and stop with the first impression. All of these pieces will always tangentially remind me of Sorgjerd’s video – like an aesthetic memento. And while having a still shot of one of the world’s great natural wonders is pretty cool, sometimes having a piece of art jog to your memory is even better.

Tags:
April 5, 2011 | Posted by | 2 Comments

Man or Monkey?

(This post via Mutual Art and Huffington Post)
Before beginning to read this article, please look at the images below. Which was drawn by a child and which by a well-known Abstract Expressionist? The answer lies a few paragraphs down.

???

???

How often have you heard people describe artworks by artists such as Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko or Cy Twombly as drawings that a 5-year-old child could have made? The answer is probably, very often. But is this true? Can children produce art whose perceived quality, as least by widespread artistic circles, matches that of renowned artists who sell their art for millions of dollars?

Untitled 1953 by Cy Twombly

Boston College psychologists Angelina Hawley-Dolan and Ellen Winner’s research, recently published in the journal Psychological Science, seeks to answer this question. When comparing artworks created by a child or even a monkey to that of an acclaimed artist, whether non-aficionados like a particular artwork or not, they can usually identify it as the product of human creativity.

Abstract A by Chris Bolmeier zatista.com

To further understand this study and its significance on our aesthetic behavior, MutualArt.com spoke with Hawley-Dolan about how people evaluate the skill in those who paint or sculpt non-representationally:

Energetic Immediacy... by Kris Haas zatista.com

What led you to research this and what significance does it play in psychology?
We began by asking ourselves – how do people evaluate abstract art, “pictures of nothing”? People have little difficulty judging the skill of artists who make representational paintings, but evaluating skill in those who paint or sculpt non-representationally is far more subjective.

Fossil by Taleen Batalian zatista.com

Works by 20th century Abstract Expressionists such as Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, or Cy Twombly have often been likened — sometimes pejoratively, sometimes positively — to children’s paintings.

Carrot-Ko by Cyn Mallard zatista.com

Though critics such as Michael Kimmelman of the New York Times assert that the scribbles of Twombly are distinct from those made by children, the superficial similarity between abstract expressionist works and markings by preschoolers has led to embarrassing confusions. For example, in 2007, 5-year-old Freddie Linsky duped the art world into paying large sums for his ketchup paintings. In 2005, three paintings by chimpanzee Congo sold for over $25,000 each — fetching more than did paintings by Warhol or Renoir.

Art by toddler Freddie Linsky

You ask what the significance of this research is for psychology. Psychologists attempt to understand all aspects of human behavior. Aesthetic behavior is universal and goes back to the earliest humans. This research shows that even people untrained in art can recognize that abstract art (so often disparaged as meaningless and without skill) has intention and planning and thought behind it that distinguishes it from the superficially similar scribbling of children and animals.

Painting by chimpanzee Congo

Here’s the answer to the question: The image on the left was drawn by 4-year-old Jack Pezanosky. The image on the right shows a work by Abstract Expressionist Hans Hoffmann.

Tags:
July 29, 2010 | Posted by | No Comments

What’s Hot in Elle Decor

Good news this month: Zatista and Zatista abstract artist Mary Lea Bradley have been featured in the July/August issue of Elle Decor Magazine. Gotta love that! Visit your local newsstand today and check us out on page 30 at the top of the “What’s Hot” list.

Until then, enjoy some examples of Mary Lea Bradley’s colorful and dreamy paintings here. These expressive images are hard to resist!

Mary Lea Bradley "328 Untitled" zatista.com

Mary Lea Bradley "351 Untitled" zatista.com

Mary Lea Bradley "377 Untitled zatista.com

Mary Lea Bradley "409 Untitled" zatista.com

Mary Lea Bradley "Unchained 5" zatista.com

Mary Lea Bradley "Unchained 4" zatista.com

March 8, 2010 | Posted by | 11 Comments

Featured Artist: Kevin Brewerton

Kick boxing champion to abstract artist? Zatista’s contributing writer Joe Conway sat down with L.A. based artist Kevin Brewerton to discuss his original, and very physical path to the canvas.

I’ve read that you grew up “hating art,” so how did you move from the athletic world into the creative world as an artist and appreciator of art?

I guess I didn’t really hate it, I just didn’t understand it. I grew up in a coal-mining town in northern England, I was from a working class family and we were always taught that art was for rich people.

I moved to London when I was 17 and while I didn’t understand art at the time, I always found myself at the Tate Gallery or in some other gallery. I wound up coming out of boxing gyms and going into art galleries, I guess I was always drawn to art.

I think though I was always an artist. I expressed myself as an artist in the athletic world in the boxing ring — on a different kind of canvas. Expressing myself is what I’ve always been after. I think the expression is the impetus and the drive.

Your work either flirts with abstraction or embraces it outwardly. It’s interesting that you went from someone who felt alienated by art to someone who embraced abstraction, because that’s usually what many people find the most daunting.

I’m drawn to abstraction because I find it to be very spiritual. All the great artists talk about art being a mirror of your deepest feelings; your personal feelings, and I think that abstract art really is.

Mahoning, Franz Klein - 1956

I look at a piece of art I like from Franz Klein — he lived in NY and he did lots of abstracts in black and white. There’s this tension between the black and white, and they look very simple; they’re simply painted. But within it, within the framework it’s quite easy to see someone who is holding on.

When I attack a canvas, I might have an image of what I want to go after, and sometimes I have no idea. Abstraction is immediate, spontaneous, provocative. I’ll just start; it’s a subconscious thing that’s working and you’re working from your deepest level of unconscious and putting your soul on that canvas. It’s about exploration, it’s about discovery, it’s about learning about yourself, about revealing yourself.

You have said that creating art takes just as much if not more courage than stepping into the ring. Was starting to make art a matter of courage for you?

One of the first things I learned from my mentor, Milton Katselas, is that if you’re afraid of something, then you have to do it. There’s no place for fear if you want to be an artist. Being a five-time world kickboxing champion I figured, “I know what fear is, I can go in the ring with anyone.”

To be a great fighter, you have to have heart: with art you reveal your heart. With fighting, it’s all about protecting, covering up and putting a wall around yourself so that no one can get to you. When I became an artist I had to relearn everything: I had to take the walls down and reveal myself. It was much harder than putting walls up to protect myself.

You’re kind of a success story in terms of your relationship with art, going from feeling alienated by it to becoming an artist and appreciator. Do you have any recommendations for people who are learning to approach art, maybe by looking at your art?

I think the best way to approach art is to get a canvas or a sketch pad, some paints or a pencil and just start. Once you start the process, it’s infectious. You don’t have to be skilled, good at it, or have years of training to immediately benefit from it. It’s a part of our inherent, creative spirit and when you connect with it, it’ll lead you right into it. Just start.

There’s an obvious connection to your athletic past in the figures that you paint, does your relationship with sport have any other bearing on your work today?

The semi-figurative boxers I paint, they’re all part of me. I ended up doing a series of them and I’ve been approaching them from different perspectives when I paint. Sometimes I’m reminded of different fighters who I’ve faced, but usually they’re coming from some sort of stage or phase that’s happening inside of me. In some respect, they’re all a kind of self-portrait.

Are you still training?  Has you art affected your athleticism?

I do still train. I think about it as an expression, the way I move when I’m kickboxing. Martial art is, after all, art. My mentor Milton Katselas talked about what we possess as artists and how powerful art is. He talked about the world of physical strength, athleticism—about guys who are unable to break in or find it more difficult to break into themselves—it goes back to courage.

It’s the courage to be vulnerable, to have vulnerability in your art which makes it more human. What he said is that art is about humanity, it’s about life. I think that’s what changed me when I started “becoming” an artist. I mean, what’s bigger than life? Why not create art? It’s in every aspect of our lives.

Do you know of other artists these days who blur the line between athleticism and art?

I don’t. I think I may have read about a boxer in the 1920’s who was also a painter.

Who are your greatest inspirations artistically?

Motherwell: For sheer scale and depth.

Pollock: Action painter—no beginning and no end point.

Yves Kline: Audacious. Spiritual.

On Zatista I like Kim Curtis,

Sandra Wray,

and I found Lisa Cacciopoli’s work provocative.

Anything to add?

There is one more thing that I’d like to say, and that is that each painting has a life of its own. I often don’t know what I’m doing or where I’m going until I get there. Not unlike stepping into a ring, the process requires faith.

SELECT YOUR LOCAL COUNTRY

By selecting a local country, you will be able to see prices in your local currency. Additionally, measurements will be shown in your local system.

Your selection will be saved, but you may change it at any time.



Country Selection:   



Submit changes    Cancel