Art History

April 30, 2013 | Posted by | No Comments

Van Gogh – New Discoveries

The Bedroom by Van Gogh photo: http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/

According to the Wall Street Journal last week: The modern myth of the tortured artist was launched by the turbulent life of Vincent van Gogh, whose bold paintings have been viewed as spontaneous outpourings of an anguished soul. Now, results of research into van Gogh’s work habits shed new light on the Dutchman, who emerges as less a hopeless Romantic than a diligent technician.

Still life with Carafe and Lemons by Van Gogh photo: http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/

A research project called, “Van Gogh’s Studio Practice,” culminates on Wednesday when its findings will be incorporated into a new exhibition, “Van Gogh at Work,” which opens the newly renovated Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam. Prior to this, there has never been such extensive research into van Gogh’s paintings and drawings.

http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/

Butterflies and Poppies by Van Gogh photo: http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/

Among the key discoveries is an understanding of how van Gogh used something called a “perspective frame”—a wooden rectangle, crisscrossed with threads—to help him accurately capture the physical world.

The Sea at Les Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer by Van Gogh photo: http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/

Head of Collections at the Van Gogh Museum says the frame was threaded like a grid or alternatively, threaded diagonally like a Union Jack flag. Van Gogh would look through these at his subjects, and then transfer that regulated view onto the canvas. New infrared examinations revealed that he actually traced the outlines of the threaded frame right onto the canvas, fixing a sense of order early on, and giving a hidden rigor to paintings that are admired for their wild expressiveness.

show enlargment The Garden of Saint Paul's Hospital ('The Fall of the Leaves') by Van Gogh photo: http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/

Van Gogh was not the only artist at the time using the device – Degas also used a perspective frame, but Van Gogh used it in a distinct way. Discoveries also show that Van Gogh reused canvases quite often leaving layers of paint on a single canvas.

View of Auvers by Van Gogh http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/

Until the mid-19th century, artists made their own paints, using traditional pigments. But van Gogh belonged to one of the first generations of artists who bought mass-produced paints sold in tubes. He then went on to refine his colors by mixing them together.

Van Gogh's palette photo: Van Gogh Museum

Van Gogh experts have long known that some of these paints were vulnerable to fading. Until now, the experts have relied on descriptions in van Gogh’s letters to correctly identify original colors; they have also found clues in the bits of paint on the edge of canvasses, where the frames shielded the pigments from damaging light. Now, using a combination of technologies, the project has determined something like the original appearances of affected major works. Being able to see famous paintings in their original colors can be quite shocking after the public has been viewing them in a faded state for so many years.

Wheatfield Under Thunderclouds by Van Gogh photo: http://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/

Visitors to “Van Gogh at Work” will be able to compare the new digital renderings [of paintings in their original colors], accessed on computer tablets in an educational section of the exhibition. In September, visitors will also be able to download an app on their own devices. In art history and conservation, fading paint has long been a problem. But now we’ll be able to see these works as the artists meant for us to see them.

 

March 14, 2013 | Posted by | No Comments

Audubon’s Birds

Head of a Southern Cassowary is one of 474 bird watercolors by John James Audubon

Head of a Southern Cassowary by John James Audubon

According to the Associated Press (AP), the New-York Historical Society is exhibiting its entire collection of 474 bird watercolors by John James Audubon for the first time. They’re being shown chronologically in three exhibitions over the next three years.

"Snowy Owls" is from a rare first edition set of John James Audubon’s “The Birds of America”

The first group went on view Friday. The exhibit also celebrates the the release of the lavishly illustrated book Audubon’s Aviary: The Original Watercolors for “The Birds of America”―published by the New-York Historical Society and Skira/Rizzoli and winner of a 2013 New York Book Show Award.

John James Audubon (1785-1851), Great Egret (Ardea alba), 1821

The collection includes 435 watercolors engraved for Audubon’s monumental “The Birds of America.” The intricately detailed, life-size renderings are the naturalist’s greatest work. An original edition of Audubon’s book, known as the double elephant folio, is also being shown. Its plates will be turned weekly.  The exhibit will showcase every masterpiece from its unparalleled collection of John James Audubon’s preparatory watercolor models for The Birds of America (1827–38).

Carolina Parakeet (Conuropsis carolinensis), Study for Havell pl. no. 26

The 3 1/2-foot-tall volume features all the avian species known to Audubon in early 19th-century North America. He sold the engraved plates in a subscription series. The museum purchased all the watercolors, except one, from the artist’s widow in 1863. The exhibit features the stunning collection alongside engaging state-of-the-art media installations that will provide a deeper understanding of the connection between art and nature.

Northern Parula (Parula americana), Study for Havell pl. no. 15

Times flies when you’re having fun. The first exhibition ends May 19th.

 

March 7, 2013 | Posted by | No Comments

Art and the Madness of the March Hare

European Hare on Wikipedia.org

According to Wikipedia, the expression “mad as a March hare”  “is an English idiomatic phrase derived from the observed antics, said to occur (some say incorrectly) only in the March breeding season, of the Hare, genus Lepus. The phrase is an allusion that can be used to refer to any other animal or human who behaves in the excitable and unpredictable manner of a ‘March hare’.”

March Hare by John Tenniel on Wikipedia.org

In his 1865 novel Alice’s Adventures in WonderlandLewis Carroll created a memorable character from this old proverb in the form of the March Hare, one of the whimsical guests at the Tea Party, for whom John Tenniel’s illustration remains most people’s preferred or most recognizable realization.

The March Hare as he appears in the 1951 film Alice in Wonderland

Long after its appearance in a beloved literary classic, and even further removed from its proverbial origins, The March Hare appears in film numerous times, most notably in animated form in the Disney classic and nearly 60 years later as Thackery Earwicket in another Disney film created by Tim Burton.

Thackery Earwicket as he appears in the 2010 film

In fact, imdb lists 39 appearances of this character from 1931 to 2011. From the very first sighting of the antics of hares in spring, it seems we have a fascination for excitable, unpredictable, even nonsensical behavior, even if it turns out on closer inspection to make its own kind of perfect sense. As this can also be said of most artists, perhaps there is a little bit of the March Hare in us all.

Detail of Ra Bat canvas by Brian Sylvester 2009

It is with mixed emotions that I arrive in this paragraph at the end of my last WallSpin post. After over two years of weekly appearances, it’s time to move on to other things. Many thanks to all of you who have left positive comments here and elsewhere, and to Zatista for giving me this opportunity to step back occasionally from making art to write about it.

Many thanks to Brian Sylvester for being a contributing writer here on WallSpin. If you’d like to be a guest blogger, let us know!

 

February 28, 2013 | Posted by | 1 Comment

The Artist’s Palette

Palette No. 1 from Thatslikewhoa.com

In more than one place on the internet I’ve recently seen images purportedly of famous artists’ actual working palettes. I am not certain of the original source or even whether these are authentic artifacts.

Palette No. 2 on Thatslikewhoa.com

If you are a better fact checker than I, and can learn more than I did, please let me know. For those of you who have not stumbled upon them yet via Google, here are some of them for your consideration.

Palette No. 3 on Thatslikewhoa.com

Whether or not these are genuine, I like the idea of being able to mentally reconstruct master painters’ works by examining where they literally came from.  At the very least, they make an interesting conversation starter.

Palette No. 4 on Thatslikewhoa.com

If I and whoever else stumbles on these images had not already seen the names of the artists below the images, it would have been a nice challenge, even a fun party game, especially among more art-minded friends, to try to guess the artist by their colors and how they are applied.

Palette No. 5 on Thatslikewhoa.com

Which is why I have left off the names until the end of this post, in case you would like to try your luck.

Palette No. 6 on Thatslikewhoa.com

Warning: stop here if you still want to guess!

The artists are, in order:

Van Gogh

Paul Gauguin

Gustave Moreau

Georges Seurat

Eugene Delacroix

Edgar Degas

How did you do? Let us know here on WallSpin.

Brian Sylvester is a guest blogger on WallSpin, and an artist on Zatista.

 

 

February 26, 2013 | Posted by | No Comments

Fish In Art

Pike by Georganna Lenssen on Zatista.com

According to Art News there’s a new book out about the age old subject of fish in art, “Fish have historically proved slippery subjects for artists—and not just for the obvious reasons. Until recently, fish couldn’t be photographed in their native environments, and artists had to rely on cloudy memories of seeing them underwater.”

Koi Pond by Michael Begenyi on Zatista.com

“Similarly, a still life with a caught creature had to be completed swiftly, before the specimen rotted. Naturalist Christine Jackson’s Fish in Art, published by Reaktion Books, uses nearly 200 images of fish—ranging from ancient Egyptian wall works to 21st-century photorealist paintings—to illustrate their religious, social, political, and economic significance.”

Grouper Time by Sue Katz on Zatista.com

The book is described by Art News as, “the first survey of fish in two-dimensional art, is divided by habitat, with chapters relating to the sea, the beach, the river, and still waters, as well as to the market, the kitchen, and, lastly, the table. Jackson isolates the aquatic animals’ form as one that has always fascinated artists. Strokes of black ink on silk in a Song Dynasty fan coalesce into a school of fish interweaving on a golden background; hundreds of years later, Paul Klee depicted them as flat, primitive shapes in neon colors.”

Swirling Around by Lynne Cunningham on Zatista.com

The book describes an art lesson once given by Eduard Manet to a pupil about still-life painting. “You don’t try to count the scales on the salmon,” Manet instructed, “you see them as little silver pearls against gray and pink.”

Pacific Blue Marlin by Anthony Dunphy

Apparently, there aren’t many contemporary interpretations of fish in the book. But lucky for you, we have plenty of contemporary interpretations of this classic subject here on Zatista.com. Since the earth is largely covered by the fish’s watery domain, we find the subject universally appealing. In many ways similar to art, water contains all the mysteriousness of the unknown.

SELECT YOUR LOCAL COUNTRY

By selecting a local country, you will be able to see prices in your local currency. Additionally, measurements will be shown in your local system.

Your selection will be saved, but you may change it at any time.



Country Selection:   



Submit changes    Cancel