Try original art risk free: 100% guarantee and free returns. Find out more >
April 5, 2011 | Posted by | 2 Comments

Man or Monkey?

(This post via Mutual Art and Huffington Post)
Before beginning to read this article, please look at the images below. Which was drawn by a child and which by a well-known Abstract Expressionist? The answer lies a few paragraphs down.

???

???

How often have you heard people describe artworks by artists such as Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko or Cy Twombly as drawings that a 5-year-old child could have made? The answer is probably, very often. But is this true? Can children produce art whose perceived quality, as least by widespread artistic circles, matches that of renowned artists who sell their art for millions of dollars?

Untitled 1953 by Cy Twombly

Boston College psychologists Angelina Hawley-Dolan and Ellen Winner’s research, recently published in the journal Psychological Science, seeks to answer this question. When comparing artworks created by a child or even a monkey to that of an acclaimed artist, whether non-aficionados like a particular artwork or not, they can usually identify it as the product of human creativity.

Abstract A by Chris Bolmeier zatista.com

To further understand this study and its significance on our aesthetic behavior, MutualArt.com spoke with Hawley-Dolan about how people evaluate the skill in those who paint or sculpt non-representationally:

Energetic Immediacy... by Kris Haas zatista.com

What led you to research this and what significance does it play in psychology?
We began by asking ourselves – how do people evaluate abstract art, “pictures of nothing”? People have little difficulty judging the skill of artists who make representational paintings, but evaluating skill in those who paint or sculpt non-representationally is far more subjective.

Fossil by Taleen Batalian zatista.com

Works by 20th century Abstract Expressionists such as Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, or Cy Twombly have often been likened — sometimes pejoratively, sometimes positively — to children’s paintings.

Carrot-Ko by Cyn Mallard zatista.com

Though critics such as Michael Kimmelman of the New York Times assert that the scribbles of Twombly are distinct from those made by children, the superficial similarity between abstract expressionist works and markings by preschoolers has led to embarrassing confusions. For example, in 2007, 5-year-old Freddie Linsky duped the art world into paying large sums for his ketchup paintings. In 2005, three paintings by chimpanzee Congo sold for over $25,000 each — fetching more than did paintings by Warhol or Renoir.

Art by toddler Freddie Linsky

You ask what the significance of this research is for psychology. Psychologists attempt to understand all aspects of human behavior. Aesthetic behavior is universal and goes back to the earliest humans. This research shows that even people untrained in art can recognize that abstract art (so often disparaged as meaningless and without skill) has intention and planning and thought behind it that distinguishes it from the superficially similar scribbling of children and animals.

Painting by chimpanzee Congo

Here’s the answer to the question: The image on the left was drawn by 4-year-old Jack Pezanosky. The image on the right shows a work by Abstract Expressionist Hans Hoffmann.

2 Comments

  • cyn mallard says:
    April 9, 2011 at 2:53 pm

    Thanks for featuring Carrot-ko in your post alongside some other very well known artists and Zatista artists. Because of the nature of my work, I have been following Boston College psychologists Angelina Hawley-Dolan and Ellen Winner’s research with interest.
    Best – Cyn

  • abstract art says:
    April 20, 2011 at 9:21 am

    Nice post. It,s two minds, one art.

SELECT YOUR LOCAL COUNTRY

By selecting a local country, you will be able to see prices in your local currency. Additionally, measurements will be shown in your local system.

Your selection will be saved, but you may change it at any time.



Country Selection:   



Submit changes    Cancel